-
pdf Evaluating Motion Constraints for 3D Wayfinding in Immersive and Desktop Virtual Environments ↗
Click to read abstract
Motion constraints providing guidance for 3D navigation have recently been suggested as a way of offloading some of the cognitive effort of traversing complex 3D environments on a computer. We present findings from an evaluation of the benefits of this practice where users achieved significantly better results in memory recall and performance when given access to such a guidance method. The study was conducted on both standard desktop computers with mouse and keyboard, as well as on an immersive CAVE system. Interestingly, our results also show that the improvements were more dramatic for desktop users than for CAVE users, even outperforming the latter. Furthermore, the study indicates that allowing the users to retain local control over the navigation on the desktop platform helps them in familiarizing themselves with the 3D world.
-
Conference Paper#11
pdf Tour Generation for Exploration of 3D Virtual Environments ↗
Click to read abstract
Navigation in complex and large-scale 3D virtual environments has been shown to be a difficult task, imposing a high cognitive load on the user. In this paper, we present a comprehensive method for assisting users in exploring and understanding such 3D worlds. The method consists of two distinct phases: an off-line computation step deriving a grand tour using the world geometry and any semantic target information as input, and an on-line interactive navigation step providing guided exploration and improved spatial perception
-
pdf Occlusion Management in Immersive and Desktop 3D Virtual Environments: Theory and Evaluation ↗
Mihail Eduard TudoreanuClick to read abstract
We present an empirical usability experiment studying the relative strengths and weaknesses of three different occlusion management techniques for discovering and accessing objects in information-rich 3D virtual environments. More specifically, the study compares standard 3D navigation, generalized fisheye techniques using object scaling and transparency, and the BalloonProbe interactive 3D space distortion technique. Subjects are asked to complete a number of representative tasks, including counting, pattern recognition, and object relation, in different kinds of environments and on both immersive and desktop-based VR systems. The environments include a free-space abstract 3D environment and a virtual 3D walkthrough application for a simple building floor. Our results confirm the general guideline that each task calls for a specialized interaction---no single technique performed best across all tasks and worlds. The results also indicate a clear trade-off between speed and accuracy: simple navigation was the fastest but also most error-prone technique, whereas spherical BalloonProbe and transparency-based fisheye proved the most accurate but required longer completion time, making it suitable for applications where mistakes incur a high cost.
-
Conference Paper#6
pdf Evaluating the Effectiveness of Occlusion Reduction Techniques for 3D Virtual Environments ↗
Mihail Eduard TudoreanuClick to read abstract
We present an empirical usability experiment studying the relative strengths and weaknesses of three different occlusion reduction techniques for discovering and accessing objects in information-rich 3D virtual environments. More specifically, the study compares standard 3D navigation, generalized fisheye techniques using object scaling and transparency, and the BalloonProbe interactive 3D space distortion technique. Subjects are asked to complete a number of different tasks, including counting, pattern recognition, and object relation, in different kinds of environments with various properties. The environments include a free-space abstract 3D environment and a virtual 3D walkthrough application for a simple building floor. The study involved 16 subjects and was conducted in a three-sided CAVE environment. Our results confirm the general guideline that each task calls for a specialized interaction---no single technique performed best across all tasks and worlds. The results also indicate a clear trade-off between speed and accuracy; simple navigation was the fastest but also most error-prone technique, whereas spherical BalloonProbe proved the most accurate